Showing posts with label Human Rights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Human Rights. Show all posts

Thursday, May 6, 2010

Struggles in Nepal continue...

BBC Article on newest continuing strike in Nepal
 
 Maoists have been holding a strike (bandh) since May1st. They are trying to kick the current prime minster out on false pretenses stemming from Maoist Leader Prachanda's unskillful firing of the Chief of Police last May.  Though, that is only one point on the discussion table.

The reality that the deadlline (and the funding) for the constituent assembly to have finished their draft of the new constitution (May 28th) is rapidly approaching. 

People in Kathmandu are frustrated and fed-up with the political elites making decisions only to benefit them. 

Saturday, January 23, 2010

Gay Marriage Legal in Nepal

Everyone come for a visit! Who cares about Massachusetts!
Destination Weddings for ALL!

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Many Voices and Concerns on Kashmir Solution

Peace conference called by two separatist leaders of J & K at the Indian International Center seem to speak about the 'real' issues here.  Ethnic group rights in the process need to be heard - many people are greatly affected by the stalemate in the northern areas.  Neither is willing to give an inch to the other and the 'dialogue' process is at a standstill because credibility of this technique has been lost through eruptions of violence in the past 15 years. 

One of the leaders, Sajjad Lone, proposes trade as a means to build trust and build the economy of the region.  Through this, the region can be unburdened by "the monotony of sovereignty."  He released a document called "Achievable Nationhood," the first of its kind since violence in 1989, at the beginning of Jan 2010.  Is this just the type of leadership that the region is needing to emerge from protracted conflict?

The paper calls for tax-free movement of goods between a united J & K. "Lone's peace formula comes a month after Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf said Islamabad would abandon its claim to Kashmir if India agreed to give the territory autonomy under joint supervision by both countries," says Reuters. 

Monday, January 4, 2010

Gilgit-Baltistan


Historically (? Source) a part of Kashmir (State language is Urdu but linguistics in Baltistan suggest strong connection to Tibeto-Burmese languages as opposed to Persian/Arabic What is the persian/arabic family of languages called?) folks in Gilgit-Baltistan have been under Pakistani rule since 1949. 

India recently made a public claim for the region.  This article verbalizes India's claim that Pakistan is illegally occupying the land there, despite claims from the newly elected Chief Minister Mehdi Shah that the region has no connection to Kashmir.  Elections in November were successfuly administered and CM Shah's win made G/B officially the fifth province in Pakistan. 

India is calling out Pakistan for not addressing human rights violations that have occured in the past few years as the seperatist movement is gaining momentum. 


Watch this region - another example of contracted ethnic conflict where struggle for human rights against oppressive nationalist government is compounded by the fact that many eyes are on the strategic region.  Issues are Karakoram Highway (KKH) for trade with China, Taliban presence in areas north and west of Balitistan, other seperatist movements as a result of central Pakistani government not paying much attention to folks up there - including human rights issues of food and resource accessability, health needs, and education. Read this one about that.